Managing Technical Debt Systematically: Without Stopping the Business
A pragmatic approach to modernizing legacy code without blocking day-to-day operations. With concrete methods and prioritization.
Custom software development, API design, and technical consulting. From architecture through code reviews to go-live: pragmatic and quality-driven.
Systematic reduction instead of starting over: lower maintenance costs, faster releases.
Tests, CI/CD, and reviews are part of the process, not an afterthought.
Pairing and knowledge transfer instead of a black box: your team can evolve the system.
Technology chosen by context and business impact, not by trend.
Tailored software solutions: from web apps and APIs to complex backend systems.
RESTful and GraphQL APIs, microservice architectures, and clean integration into existing system landscapes.
Systematic analysis of existing codebases: quality, security, performance, and maintainability.
Architecture decisions, technology evaluation, and hands-on support for your development team.
from €2,500
1–2 days + report
on request Priced by scope
on request Priced by scope
Every project starts with a free intro call.
Every commit takes the same path: build, test, production. Security checks at three gates instead of being bolted on at the end.
Analysis of codebase, architecture, and processes.
Target picture, roadmap, and prioritization by risk.
Iterative delivery with tests, CI/CD, and reviews.
Knowledge transfer, documentation, and enablement of your team.
Modernize outdated codebases and unify fragmented systems: for lower maintenance costs and faster feature delivery.
Old architectures, inconsistent code quality, and missing automation slow down release cycles and create technical debt.
Phased modernization with a clear strategy: from Strangler Fig pattern to API layers to full rewrites, context-dependent.
Faster feedback loops and predictable releases for continuous innovation.
Manual testing, fragmented tools, and slow deployment pipelines make iterations risky and delay time-to-market.
Automated build-test-deploy pipelines, feature flags, and canary releases: for safe, fast delivery.
Build reliable, secure applications that scale without increasing operational overhead.
Inconsistent dev environments, missing observability, and limited DevOps integration hinder stability.
Cloud-native architecture with container orchestration, Infrastructure as Code, and centralized monitoring.
Off-the-shelf software wins when your process matches the standard. Custom software development wins when the process is your competitive advantage: pricing logic no configurator can express, integrations between systems the vendor never anticipated, a customer portal that should feel like your company. A second trigger is growing license and customization costs that over the years exceed the cost of a dedicated solution. We advise honestly in both directions, even when the answer is to buy rather than build.
Custom software has to outlive the project that created it. That is why automated tests, CI/CD, and code reviews are part of our approach rather than a downstream phase. Architecture decisions are documented so they remain traceable in three years. And handover is planned from the start: pairing with your team, understandable documentation, no black box. The benchmark is a system your team can evolve without us, even though we are happy to stay on board.
There are no serious flat rates for custom software, but there is a predictable entry point: the architecture review starting at 2,500 euros delivers a tech-debt map and a roadmap with effort estimates. The modernization pilot then takes a bounded part of the system to production and provides the pattern for the rest. Only with that knowledge do reliable project prices emerge. What we do not do: quote numbers before we understand the scope.
EverBright IT is based in Unterföhring near Munich. We are happy to run workshops, architecture reviews, and kickoffs on-site at your place or ours; ongoing development works just as reliably remotely, with daily visibility through the repository, the board, and short syncs. This is how we work with companies in Munich and Bavaria as well as across the entire DACH region, without travel costs weighing on the project budget.
When releases slow down, bugs pile up, or larger investments are ahead. The result is a prioritized tech-debt map with a concrete roadmap: from €2,500.
The predictable entry point is the architecture review starting at 2,500 euros: it delivers a tech-debt map and a roadmap with effort estimates. We quote project prices only afterwards, once the scope is understood. Anything else would be guesswork corrected expensively later.
Usually incremental: e.g. via the Strangler Fig pattern or API layers. A full rewrite is rarely the most economical option; we decide based on risk and business impact.
More on managing tech debt in the blog →Yes, preferably: pairing, reviews, and knowledge transfer are part of how we work. We do not leave a black box behind, but a team that can evolve the system.
Java/Spring Boot, Python, TypeScript/Node.js, Go, and .NET on the backend; React, Vue, and Astro on the frontend. The choice follows context, not hype.
Automated tests, CI/CD, code reviews, and observability from day one. For us, quality is a process, not a downstream phase.
Martin-Jan Sklorz
CTO · Software Architecture, Cloud & AI Engineering
Sergej Bardin
CEO · AI Strategy & IT Consulting
Independent Profiles
A pragmatic approach to modernizing legacy code without blocking day-to-day operations. With concrete methods and prioritization.
Microservices or monolith? Decision criteria, common pitfalls, and practical experience from real migration projects in mid-sized companies.
What sets DevSecOps apart from traditional DevOps? Shift-left security, SAST, SCA, DAST tooling, and concrete CI/CD pipeline examples.
Let's find out how we can help in a free initial consultation.